Haphazard views : A snooping psyche dissected

An e-space full of ramblings and mumblings


One last nail...



I would love to start this by congratulating three gentlemen who attained absolute success through their sustained dedication, iron determination and repeated attempts in order to achieve the goal they had been trying to over the past six months or so.
My heartiest congratulations to you, Mr Kiran More, Mr Greg Chappel and of course Mr Rahul Dravid. So finally your great trio has managed to pull it off. Well done.

After the second test against Sri Lanka at Delhi, when Sourav Ganguly was dropped from the squad all of a sudden in spite of performing reasonably well (he scored 40 and 39 in both the innings and his partnerships with Sachin Tendulkar and Yuvraj Singh in either of the innings proved to be the principal deciding factors as those had sealed the match and the series in India's favour), the whole of India had reacted to this injustice very strongly and unable to cope up with the pressure created by the media as well as the mass, the BCCI selection committee headed by More had no other option but to include him in the Pakistan-bound squad as it was also the heavyweight Chairperson of BCCI, Mr Sharad Pawar's unwritten order. So they (More & Co) couldn't have left him out even if they badly wanted to.

The team landed in Pakistan. So did Ganguly but six days later as he was asked by More to play the Ranji semi-final before leaving.

First test at Lahore.
Result: Drawn.
Details are here.


Ganguly did not get to bat. In fact no one did other than Dravid and Sehwag.

Second test at Faislabad.
Result: Drawn.
Details are here.

Ganguly was not included in the eleven in this match as they wanted to go in with one extra specialist bowler.

Third test at Karachi.
Result : India loses by a mammoth 341 runs.
Details are here.

Ganguly scored 34 and 37 in both innings. Let us look at what the other specialist batters did in this match for India. Sehwag - 5 & 4, Dravid- 3 & 2, Tendulkar - 23 & 26, Laxman - 19 & 21, Yuvraj - 45 & 122, Dhoni - 13 & 18.
So, the statistics show that Ganguly had outscored everybody except Yuvraj in this match. Everyone who has seen him bat in Karachi would agree that he was looking the most comfortable among all Indian batters against the likes of Shoaib Akhtar and Mohammed Asif. He looked in definite good nick.


He wasn't picked up for the ODI squad. However, we won the ODI series quite comprehensively (4-1) in the end despite failing to defend 328 in the first match.
Ganguly has scored 10,000 plus runs in ODIs and has a 40+ average with 22 hundreds. And he is not considered a good enough player to make it to the team by a committe which is headed by someone who himself had been a very very ordinary cricketer in his days, dropped lollypops behind the wicket on numerous occasions costing us quite a few matches and doesn't have a single 50+ score in his 94 ODIs. Sounds like a preparatory student deciding whether the class teacher is good enough to pass an exam or not. Anyways, such a person can not be blamed really because he has got a position which he doesn't deserve in the first place. It's like waking up a poor peasant from sound sleep and making him the crown prince of the country all of a sudden before he fully wakes up - the poor chap just doesn't know what to do. He loses his senses and works in a state of trance. Exactly the same thing happened when More said that "Ganguly will not make the team as long as this selection committee is in charge" .

The Excerpts:

Game over

Kiran More says Ganguly will not make the team as long as this selection committee is in charge

Amit Gupta in Vadodara

According to a popular north Indian saying, when a big tree falls, the earth around it shakes. The five wise men that make the national selection committee though, have decided to shake the earth to fell the big tree.

After a marathon two-and-a-half long meeting, also attended by coach Greg Chappell, chief selector Kiran More put to coffin the career of one of the most celebrated and controversial Indian players.

As board secreatary Niranjan Shah read out ther list of players for the Nagpur test, there was a lingering hope that Ganguly’s name would be next. But as the list ended, minus that name, the room was enveloped in a stunned 10-second silence. The lull before the storm.

Then came the bullets in the form of questions. Kiran More had answers to a few, but most left him wounded.

The reasons for the axe ranged from the stubborn to the ridiculous. “It is a very important move for us. We are looking at the future of the Indian cricket and have decided to stick to youngsters like Mohammed Kaif and Suresh Raina. Everyone in the committee was unanimous about the decision to drop Sourav. We even talked to Rahul Dravid about this over phone and he expressed his happiness.”

He then made it clear that this was the end of road for Sourav. “There is no looking back on the issue as far as this commitee is concerned. We are not going to pick him. We are very positive about the issue. The West Indies tour and then the World Cup are approaching fast. We are looking at more or less a similar side for the one-dayers and test cricket.”

And as the questions grew more pointed, More’s tone become a bit harsh. “We were not discussing just one name. All departments of the game were discussed, many more names like Venugopal Rao, Aakash Chopra (what?), Cheteshwar Pujara came up for discussion. Chappell was there, he briefed us on the Pakistan trip, he had some ideas. Why are you asking only about Sourav? Ask about Dhoni, he has been wonderful. We were picking an Indian side, not a school side. It takes some time.”

How unceremonious an exit it has been for Sourav can be gauged from the fact that none of the selectors, Dravid or any BCCI officials spoke to the former skipper. “Who will talk to him? He will come to know from the media,” Niranjan Shah told Mumbai Mirror, before adding that they couldn’t tell him to retire point-blank. “For us, the Sourav issue is over.”

More added, “It’s a tough call, and until now no one has had a word with him. We may talk to him later, but I do not think that’s necessarry. Selectors have to make some tough decision.”

While it was the end for Sourav, for Piyush Chawla and VRV Singh it was celebration time. Chawla, the young leggie, was rewarded for a wonderful domestic season, while VRV got the nod due to his controlled pace. “Chappell wants to groom talents like this duo and Raina. We have been monitoring VRV for the past few months and he can disturb the best with his special bounce. Even Munaf Patel and Cheteshwar Pujara figure in scheme of things.”

On dropping Gautam Gambhir, More said, “Gautam had some good oppotunities and is not looking that confident and so we have given Jaffer the chance.”


Source : Mumbai Mirror, 24-Feb-2006. www.mumbaimirror.com
and also here .

By the way, isn't it the same Kiran More who was involved in a bribe controversy some time back?
According to some of the newspapers More and Roy had said Kale had offered them bribe to get him in the Indian team. Some newspapers had a slightly different take on this subject. They said it was those two selectors who had asked for bribe from Kale. No one actually knows what happened. Whatever it was, here is something which might clear up a few things.

Ok....so now we've got a reason why Mr More is so angry with Sourav Ganguly.
Understandable. Fully understandable. My sympathies are with you, Mr More. You could make money neither as a cricketer nor as a selector. So the frustrarion and the anguish are quite natural.


Now, let's move our attention to Mr Greg Chappel.



Without any doubt, he indeed is a living legend - arguably the best batsman born Down Under after Sir Don Bradman. Even decades after he quit playing, he is considered to have one of the best cricketing-brains of all time in world cricket.
Ironically, he is better known as Greg Underarm Chappel.
Over the years he has created his own grammar and theories in cricket which he believes are flawless and hence he doesn't want anyone to challenge him or even go against his wishes. That is probably why he and Ganguly never got along ever since he was made the Indian coach because as a skipper Ganguly also was very much exacting. None of them was willing to compromise on anything so one of them had to go. And since the Chairman of Selectors was already unhappy with Ganguly, he teamed up with Chappel and helped him in every possible way to prevent Ganguly from getting into the team. A very very good example of what fruits sincere joint efforts can get you. Quite a fantastic Indo-Australian collaboration it has been. Hats off !!!

Now, the Mr Dependable, the Wall, the one and only Mr Rahul Dravid.

Such a poor guy he is !!! I used to pity him when every time he used to play well someone used to play better than him for so many years. He always had to be content playing the second fiddle to either Tendulkar, or Ganguly, or Laxman and the like. Such a great batsman but his contributions used to go unnoticed almost all the time.
For people who have weak memory, Rahul 'The Wall' Dravid was once dropped from the Indian ODI squad and was out for more than a year after months of non-performance (I even remember him facing Ottis Gibson of the West Indies in the final over of a match and staying not out till the end after playing 5 dot balls and still not being to score the last 5 runs needed for victory). It was Ganguly who insisted on bringing him back as a wicketkeeper-batsman so that he can play with an extra batter and that had worked wonders. It was the Ganguly-Wright combo that found the perfect winning combination for the men in blue. Dravid-Chappel are just building on that. Yuvi, Kaif, Bhajji, Sehwag, even Dhoni got into the team because Ganguly wanted them to stay there. More than once Yuvi got himself out of the team but only because of Ganguly's insistence he could stay back and regain his form. Same happened with Bhajji. Ganguly had brought him back in the famous home series against the Aussies in 2000 and he took 32 wickets in 3 tests just to make a permanent place for him in the team. Sachin, Sehwag, Laxman, Harbhajan, Yuvraj, Kumble and to some extent Kaif too saw heights of success and stardom under ganguly's leadership but the consistent yet poor chap Dravid always went unnoticed until the Aussie tour of 2003-2004 happened. Once he started getting the full limelight with his consistent match-winning performances he knew it was 'now or never' for him. Fortunately for Dravid, Ganguly was going through a rough patch and also he got himself into more trouble by his confrontation with Chappel. More & Co were waiting for this and they without any hesitation offered the captaincy to Dravid who had been in the reckoning for almost a decade now without any stars on his shoulder. Unwillingly he had to play the supporting role for years. Once he got the captaincy, his main objective in life became to keep it and just to get rid of the feeling of insecurity the first thing he needed to do was to keep Ganguly out of the team in any way because if he is in the squad, he won't be able to see eye-to-eye with him. Doesn't his own statement reflect this? My sympathies are with you also, Mr Dravid. I know how it feels to play the deputy's role to someone who debuted with you in the same match and from the very first match had been stealing the limelight from you. Your fantastic knocks of 95 and 84 in your first two test innings were overshadowed by his 131 and 136 in those same innings. And these things kept happening year after year ever since. You once got dropped from the ODI team and he brought you back as a wicketkeeper-batsman, otherwise your ODI career would have been well over. I understand that it doesn't feel good being a captain to see the face of a person who you are actually indebted to for many reasons. So, it's quite natural that you'll want him out of the team. I understand. I fully understand.

Sachin is 32 now, Dravid is 33, Laxman 31, Kumble 35 so the team certainly isn't 'all-young-blood'. Now what remains to be seen is if any of them fails to deliver in 2-3 games ('failing' means not scoring 50's and 100's....even 30's and 40's are considered failures by the logic of More & Co.), whether the same rule that was applied to Ganguly applies to them or not.

Anyways, for the time being More, Chappel and Dravid have really done a great job. Yet again hats off to their superb combined effort in putting that 'One Last nail' in Ganguly's coffin. I feel like congratulating them from the bottom of my heart again. CONGRATS Guys !!!!!!!


By the way, More's highest score in ODIs is 42 and in tests is 73. Amazing !!! Isn't it?



WHEN A LION GETS TRAPPED BY A HUNTER, EVEN THE DOGS BARK AND LAUGH AT HIM. WHAT TO DO? WE CAN'T STOOP TO THE LEVEL OF MAKING THE DOGS STOP BARKING.

Labels: ,

6 Responses to “One last nail...

  1. # Blogger Archana Ramesh

    you know, i think you need to chill a bit Dev! you're accusations against chappel and dravid specially...is strong and i quite dont know if they're rite to be made...

    'More & Co was waiting for this and they just offered the captaincy to Dravid who had been in the reckoning for almost a decade now without any stars on his shoulder. Unwillingly he had to play the supporting role for years. Once he got the captaincy, his main objective in life became to keep it and just to get rid of the feeling of insecurity the first thing he needed to do was to keep Ganguly out of the team in any way because if he is in the squad, he won't be able to see eye-to-eye with him.'
    .....how wud we know that? can a person actually predict/interpret whats on someone's mind?
    I'm not a fan of dravid nor am i taking his side cos he is from blore. I still prefer ganguly to dravid as a captain provided he gets his form rite....i can never forget that he's been one of the best captains our team has ever seen or those wins his decisions gave but he's also a player, not just a captain..
    its not fair that sourav hasnt had his chance[i'm sure though, he'll get back]. but also its just not fair to accuse...
    a hit in the stomach motivates me....looking at him play at the coal mines...maybe it works for him too  

  2. # Blogger Apocalyptus

    Archana,
    For your kind information, I'm not a Ganguly fan. And I think I'm quite rational in whatever I have said in my blog. It's really sad to see that you missed the whole point.
    I questioned More's credibility and credentials as a national selector and criticized Dravid's role as a silent spectator. When Ganguly was the skipper, every time when a player came on the verge of being dropped, he used to fight for him to give him some more chances. Dravid could easily have done the same thing but he has just become a mere puppet in the hands of the Chappel-More super combo. He is an ungrateful, yes, UNGRATEFUL spineless human being, not willing to stand up and fight against the odds, pretty much unlike Ganguly the skipper.  

  3. # Blogger greatbong

    One thing good has come out of this. Dravid had shed off his "nice guy" image and shown that he is prepared to do anything to keep his captaincy. Anything. I like that in my captain----absolute ruthlessness. It was the quality I was always apprehensive Dravid lacked. But I was wrong. The way he colluded to finish off the career of someone whom he perceived as an alternate power center augurs well for our cricketing future. A truly able man at the helm.  

  4. # Anonymous Anonymous

    1st of all i must make it clear that i am not a fan of ganguly.But I must protest the injustice done to him.
    I always used to think him as 1 of the weakest guys in our squad and didnt think him worthy of the captaincy role in the beginning.But all that changed since the 2nd test vs Australia at Kolkata in march 2001.He showed his brilliance in the way chose bhajji just at the rite moments to bowl out the kangaroos.Following year at Champions trophy in Sri Lanka,the way he contained South Africa in the last 10 overs was absolutely amazing.Just imagine keeping Klusner being able to hit just 1 or 2 sixes in the last 10 overs and almost no boundries.How was this achieved??Sourav brought Viru into the attack.I wonder how many captains wud hav dared such a thing against the South Africans when Graem Smith(or may be it was sumone else) was on the verge of gettin a 100.Nobody,not even Kallis had any answer to ganguly's bowling attack.
    Following year,India reached the World Cup Finals.
    Next year India makes history with their 1st overseas series win in decades and better yet that too against pakistan in pakistan.
    All these achievments just go to show Ganguly's brilliance as a cricketing strategist.
    Sure Dravid is also giving India many victories,but i doubt it is dravid doing all the thinking here.Remember hu is sitting behind him-Chappell.It is Chappell hu is doing all the experiments with the batting order and bringing youngsters to the team.Dravid's role is just confined to the field settings for which too i am sure he follows instructions from chappell.So basically it is'nt Dravis hu is captain here its chappell.Dravid is the puppet here.And as for More-I think he's a sick frustrated constipated dimwit hu's role in indian cricket should be confined to washing the sweaty towels in the dressing room after play.Politics has just taken out the joy from this Gentleman's game.  

  5. # Blogger Kartik Kannan

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.  

  6. # Blogger Kartik Kannan

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.  

Post a Comment



© 2006 Haphazard views : A snooping psyche dissected | Google Newsby Google News.

See me, know me....